US Producer Price Index, Construction Materials: June 2018

Construction material prices in the US rose another +0.8% in June and are +9.6% higher than they were at the same time one year ago, according to an Associated Builders and Contractors analysis of U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data release Wednesday.
June represents the latest month associated with rapidly rising construction input prices. Nonresidential construction materials prices effectively mirrored overall construction prices by rising +0.9% on a month-over-month basis and +9.8% on a year-over-year basis.

US Construction Materials Prices: June 2018

Construction materials prices in the US are up roughly +10% in just one year, and certain categories have experienced significant rates of price increase, said the Associated Builders and Contractors analysis of U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data released Wednesday. Among these are key inputs that appear to have been impacted by evolving policymaking, including the price of crude petroleum, which is up +49% over the past year, iron and steel, which is up nearly +14%, and softwood lumber, up +23%.
Some contractors may note the similarities between the current period and the period immediately preceding the onset of the global financial crisis. Materials prices, for instance, were rising rapidly for much of 2006 and 2007 as the economic expansion that began in 2001 reached its final stages. The latest data provides further ammunition for policymakers committed to tightening monetary policy and raising short-term interest rates.
“With no end in sight regarding the ongoing tariff spat between the United States and a number of leading trading partners, and with the domestic economy continuing to expand briskly, construction input prices are positioned to increase further going forward, though the current rate of increase appears unsustainable,” said ABC Chief Economist Anirban Basu.
“In general, this emerging state of affairs is unfavourable. Rapidly rising materials prices interfere with economic progress in numerous ways, including by making it less likely that a particular development will move forward. They also increase the cost of delivering government-financed infrastructure, raise costs for final consumers such as homeowners, renters and office tenants, and exacerbate overall inflationary pressures, which serves to push nominal borrowing costs higher.”